000			03832cam a2200397Ka 4500
001			12546604
003			SE-LIBR
005			20120809144745.0
006			m d
007			cr mn||||a||||
008			120223s2011 caua ob 000 0 eng
020			_a9780833052629
020			_a0833052624
040			_aDID _dDID _dNUI _dCOD _dSipr
041			_aeng
245	1	0	_aLessons from U.S. allies in security cooperation with third countries _h[electronic resource] : _bthe cases of Australia, France, and the United Kingdom / _cJennifer D. P. Moroney, ... [et al.]
260			_aSanta Monica, CA : _bRAND, _c2011
300			_axxiii, 129 p : _bill.
490	1		_aRAND Corporation technical report series ; _vTR972
500			_a"Project Air Force"
500			_aTitle from PDF title screen (viewed on Oct. 9, 2011)
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 121-129)
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Australia's Approach to Security Cooperation -- France's Approach to Security Cooperation -- The United Kingdom's Approach to Security Cooperation -- Comparing the Case Studies -- Conclusions and Recommendations -- Appendix A: Royal Australian Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix B: Brazilian Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix C: Chilean Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix D: Colombian Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix E: French Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix F: Indian Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix G: Israeli Air and Space Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix H: Japan Air Self-Defense Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix I: Pakistan Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix J: Republic of Korea Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix K: Singapore Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix L: South African Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix M: United Arab Emirates Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners -- Appendix N: Royal Air Force Activities with Foreign Partners.
520			_a"Like the U.S. Air Force, many U.S. allies work with partner countries on security matters, sometimes even with the same partners, but on a smaller scale. But how, where, and why do these allies engage the same countries? Would working together in particular areas be worthwhile or viable and can specific lessons be learned from their experiences, for example, in the areas of planning, resourcing and assessments? This report explores these questions by examining both the positive aspects and the challenges of the security cooperation approaches of three U.S. allies, Australia, France, and the United Kingdom. These three capable allies are experienced in working with civilian counterparts and benefit from higher-level departmental guidance. They generally do so with relatively small budgets, leading them to learn to economize, pool resources, and take advantage of joint and interagency planning. These strategies can inform current U.S. thinking on security cooperation. They also suggest venues for further collaboration between allies, particularly in the three key areas of staff talks, exercises, and training followed by exercises." --publisher's website.
538			_aPDF
651		7	_aAustralia _xsecurity policy _xcooperation
651		7	_aFrance _xsecurity policy _xcooperation
651		7	_aUK _xsecurity policy _xcooperation
700	1		_aMoroney, Jennifer D. P.,
710	2		_aProject Air Force (U.S.)
710	2		_aRand Corporation
740	0		_aRand (Online publications)
852			_hCD129 G12_246
856	4	0	_uhttp://libnet.colorado.edu/survey/survey.cfm?url=http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2011/RAND_TR972.pdf
942			_cREP
999			_c77102 _d77102