000 01686cam a22003017a 4500
001 14593261
003 SE-LIBR
005 20130722102435.0
007 cr |||||||||||
008 130719s2013 xxk|||| o |00| ||eng c
020 _z978095749708 (print)
040 _aSipr
041 _aeng
245 1 0 _aRaising the bar :
_bgood anti-corruption practices in defense companies.
_nPart I: Seven practices that distinguish the best
_h[electronic resource]
256 _aText
260 _aLondon :
_bTransparency International,
_c2013
300 _a54 p.
500 _aSIP1307
500 _a"June 2013"
500 _aThe Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index (CI) was published on 4 October 2012. This analysis, the first of its kind, provided comparative information on the disclosure and quality of anti-corruption systems in 129 major defence companies. In Part II of this report - available as a separate online document - we have extracted 104 good practice examples in relation to all of the 34 questions in the Index. These examples are mostly in the public domain. However, there were also examples of good practice from the companies who opened up their companyconfidential practices, policies and procedures to review by us. Where the company has given us permission, we quote such examples as well. Part II of this report can be found at http://companies.defenceindex.org/goodpractice.
538 _aPDF
650 7 _aarms industry
_xarms production
_xcriminality
650 7 _aethics
_xleadership
700 1 _aTransparency International
856 4 0 _uhttp://companies.defenceindex.org/good-practice
942 _cEMON
999 _c78182
_d78182