000			03394cam a22003137a 4500
001			16658035
003			SE-LIBR
005			20140711111551.0
007			cr |||||||||||
008			140710s2014 xxu|||| o |00| ||eng c
020			_a9781584876168 (print)
040			_aSipr
041			_aeng
100	1		_aKrickus, Richard J.
245	1	0	_aRussia after Putin / _h[electronic resource] _cRichard J. Krickus
256			_aText
260			_aCarlisle, PA : _bStrategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, _c2014
300			_a114 p.
500			_aSIP1407
500			_a"May 2014."
520			_aDespite many obstacles, the leadership in Washington and Moscow must find ways to address security threats even as the United States rebalances toward Asia. Moreover, he agrees with prominent statesmen like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger that ultimately, Russia must be integrated into a Euro-Atlantic security system. The unexpected events of September 2013 that have resulted in a United Nations resolution compelling Syria to surrender its chemical weapons and a re-start of the Geneva negotiations to find a diplomatic resolution to the Syrian crisis offers evidence that a partnership, even if limited and fragile, is plausible. A major consideration of the U.S. national security establishment must include how to operationalize the partnership. For all intents and purposes, the United States and Russia now have taken responsibility for resolving the Syrian crisis and in the process have reached a new chapter in the reset of relations. If they succeed in finding a diplomatic solution to it, further cooperation on other shared security concerns will follow. If not, they will take a turn for the worse. (Note: This research was completed in the fall of 2013, which was prior to the recent crisis in Crimea and Ukraine)
520			_aDespite many obstacles, the leadership in Washington and Moscow must find ways to address security threats even as the United States rebalances toward Asia. Moreover, he agrees with prominent statesmen like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger that ultimately, Russia must be integrated into a Euro-Atlantic security system. The unexpected events of September 2013 that have resulted in a United Nations resolution compelling Syria to surrender its chemical weapons and a re-start of the Geneva negotiations to find a diplomatic resolution to the Syrian crisis offers evidence that a partnership, even if limited and fragile, is plausible. A major consideration of the U.S. national security establishment must include how to operationalize the partnership. For all intents and purposes, the United States and Russia now have taken responsibility for resolving the Syrian crisis and in the process have reached a new chapter in the reset of relations. If they succeed in finding a diplomatic solution to it, further cooperation on other shared security concerns will follow. If not, they will take a turn for the worse. (Note: This research was completed in the fall of 2013, which was prior to the recent crisis in Crimea and Ukraine)
538			_aPDF
651		7	_aRussia _xforeign policy _zUSA
710	2		_aArmy War College (U.S.). _bStrategic Studies Institute, SSI
856	4	1	_uhttp://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/download.cfm?q=1200
942			_cEMON
999			_c78586 _d78586